Chip vs Chip

DA14531 vs BlueNRG-LP

<\/script>\n
'; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = '{ SITE_DOMAIN }'; const type = '{ embed_type }'; const slug = '{ embed_slug }'; return ''; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Theme


      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Side-by-side comparison of DA14531 and BlueNRG-LP BLE SoCs.

DA14531 vs BlueNRG-LP: Dialog Miniaturization vs. ST Ultra-Low-Power BLE 5.2

Both the DA14531 and BlueNRG-LP compete for low-power BLE sensor and beacon applications, but from different angles: DA14531 leads in physical miniaturization, while BlueNRG-LP leads in BLE feature completeness (BLE 5.2, LC3 codec and Auracast." data-category="LE Audio">LE Audio) and packaging flexibility.


Overview

DA14531 from Dialog Semiconductor is the BLE miniaturization benchmark: 2.0 × 1.7 mm WLCSP, 48 KB SRAM, 128 KB OTP, 16 MHz M0+, and 900 nA deep sleep current. TX at 0 dBm draws 4.5 mA; receive sensitivity is −93 dBm. It targets coin-cell-powered beacons, asset tags, and simple proximity sensors.

BlueNRG-LP from STMicroelectronics is available in a 2.7 × 2.7 mm WLCSP-34 or 5 × 5 mm QFN-32 package. It integrates a 64 MHz Cortex-M0+, 256 KB flash, 64 KB SRAM, and BLE 5.2 radio achieving −106 dBm receive sensitivity and 4.6 mA RX current. Deep sleep with RTC is 0.9 µA. BLE 5.2 feature support includes LE Isochronous Channels (the foundation for LE Audio), LE Power Control, and Enhanced Attribute Protocol (ATT bearers for throughput." data-category="LE Audio">EATT).


Key Differences

  • Package: DA14531 smallest option is 2.0 × 1.7 mm; BlueNRG-LP smallest option is 2.7 × 2.7 mm — DA14531 is ~50% smaller.
  • BLE version: BlueNRG-LP implements BLE 5.2 with LE Isochronous Channels; DA14531 implements BLE 5.1.
  • SRAM: BlueNRG-LP has 64 KB; DA14531 has 48 KB — BlueNRG-LP is slightly ahead.
  • Flash: BlueNRG-LP has 256 KB re-programmable flash; DA14531 has 128 KB OTP — BlueNRG-LP is much better for OTA.
  • RX sensitivity: BlueNRG-LP achieves −106 dBm; DA14531 achieves −93 dBm — 13 dB advantage to BlueNRG-LP.
  • Sleep current: DA14531 achieves 900 nA; BlueNRG-LP achieves 900 nA — essentially identical.
  • LE Audio: BlueNRG-LP supports LE Isochronous Channels; DA14531 does not.
  • Core clock: BlueNRG-LP runs at 64 MHz; DA14531 at 16 MHz — 4× compute advantage for BlueNRG-LP.

Use Cases

DA14531 Excels At

The most size-constrained applications where 2.0 × 1.7 mm is the enabling factor — NFC/BLE combo tags, product labels with embedded BLE, contact tracing devices, medical patches. DA14531 is the choice when BlueNRG-LP's 2.7 × 2.7 mm still doesn't fit.

Extremely high volume commodity beacons where even fractional cent differences in SoC cost compound significantly across millions of units.

BlueNRG-LP Excels At

BLE 5.2 certified products — applications targeting FCC/IC/CE compliance using full BLE 5.2 features including LE Power Control and EATT, which simplify regulatory approval for healthcare devices.

LE Audio accessories and hearing devices that need LE Isochronous Channels support. DA14531's BLE 5.1 implementation cannot support these protocols.

OTA-updatable low-power sensors using BlueNRG-LP's 256 KB re-programmable flash, which accommodates on-chip OTA without external SPI flash — a significant BOM simplification over DA14531.

Long-range BLE applications at the low-power end of the market benefit from BlueNRG-LP's −106 dBm sensitivity. For the same TX power and data rate, BlueNRG-LP achieves reliable links approximately 4× farther than DA14531 before margin runs out.


Verdict

Both chips share nearly identical deep sleep profiles (900 nA with RTC), making runtime power consumption equivalent for duty-cycled sensor applications where the device spends 99%+ of its time in sleep. The decision between them hinges on factors other than idle power.

If the single binding constraint is 2.0 × 1.7 mm package size — smart label, contact patch, or miniaturized badge form factor — DA14531 is the only mainstream BLE 5.1 SoC that fits. No direct substitute at this footprint exists in volume production.

If BLE 5.2 compliance is required for healthcare regulatory approval or forward compatibility with LE Power Control and EATT profiles, BlueNRG-LP is the correct choice — DA14531's BLE 5.1 implementation cannot satisfy BLE 5.2 certification requirements.

If LE Audio (hearing aids, broadcast audio receivers, BLE audio accessories) is in the product roadmap, BlueNRG-LP's LE Isochronous Channels support is essential. DA14531 cannot serve LE Audio endpoints.

If OTA firmware updates must be supported without external SPI flash, BlueNRG-LP's 256 KB re-programmable flash makes on-chip A/B OTA feasible. DA14531's 128 KB OTP memory requires external flash for any OTA strategy, adding BOM cost and PCB complexity.

If long-range BLE is needed — warehouse coverage, outdoor asset tracking, building penetration through multiple walls — BlueNRG-LP's −106 dBm receive sensitivity provides approximately 13 dB more link margin than DA14531's −93 dBm. In free space, this translates to roughly 4× greater range at equivalent link reliability.

The only clear DA14531 advantage beyond miniaturization is cost at very high volume where fractional-cent die area differences compound across tens of millions of units. For any application where 2.7 × 2.7 mm is an acceptable footprint, BlueNRG-LP's broader feature set is generally worth the marginal package size increase.

Frequently Asked Questions

Our comparisons use verified datasheet specifications to create side-by-side tables. Each comparison includes a verdict explaining when to choose each option based on your project requirements.